Dr. Salamone Essay Example for Free

Dr. Salamone EssayThese values then let down re-incorporated back into the language. Philosopher Ian Heath states this significance, Meaning can transform the individual, while values can transform relationships (Heath). What this representation for make-upal leadership is that it is crucial to arrest meaningful relationships to create values that can guide their members in a mutually beneficial environment. The last sentence written in the above paragraph is abruptly true.This is because it is very essential for the employees working in an composition to develop relationships with the other members working in the disposal either their subordinates or their boss. Without this, it would be very difficult for an organization to operate efficiently and effectively. It is vital that the relationships that develop in an organization must also be meaningful because if the relationships are developed just standardised that they would be absolutely useless. People should know the meaning and the wideness of developing relationships and then how important from each one relationship is to them.The importances each person allocates to diametrical relationships that are developed in an organization are different just like we have different importance for people in our family. Therefore, it is essential to develop well relationships in an organization. This means that although there is a lot of competition in the organization amongst the employees but it should not be such that the employees plan out bad things against each other to gain popularity or importance in the eyes of the boss. This is not only bad for the reputation of the employee but it also bad for the organization.In order to build healthy relationships, the organization must take certain steps. Some of the examples are mentioned down the stairs that are meant to provide an insight into how organizational design impacts its workforce and image and this would be explained by differentiating in the midst of the operable and team complex body part. If I were to choose between working for an organization that has a utilitarian structure and another that has a team structure, I would you choose to work for an organization that has a functional structure. utilitarian structure essentially groups the employees together on the basis of the functions of specific jobs that are present within the organization while in the team structure the functions and the responsibilities of the employees are organized into specialized teams. (Bechthold Schodek, 2007). I would choose the functional structure because of its various advantages. operable structure reduces the duplication of personnel and equipment and I would be more favorable with this structure as it gives more opportunity to talk in the same language with my peers.Moreover, it acknowledges specialization thence making training easier. There is centralized decision making in this structure and it also provides a unifi ed direction from the top management thus achieving excellence in communication and coordination within the departments. working(a) structure also increases the quality of technical problem solving and this can be proved by the fact that it gives the workers fast access to the people who are well-versed in technical expertise. (Kaizenlog, n. d. ).Organizational design is basically the process for integrating the people, information and technology in an organization and is used to match the form of the organization with its objectives and I think that the organizational design will be an important factor for me in making a choice about the type of come with for which I would like to work because it would tell me what human body of culture is being followed in an organization and so I would be able to decide for myself if I would be comfortable working there or not and his information about a company can be found on the websites or one can ask the employees currently working in tha t organization who would give a better idea. Adidas, IKEA and Barwill are some renowned organizations that follow the functional structure while the example of an organization that follows team structure is RadioShack Corporation.( net profit Retailer, 2006). Reference Bechthold,M. Schodek,D. L. (2007). Structures. 6th Edn. Prentice Hall, Hardcover. Internet Retailer. (2006). RadioShack Corporation Announces New Management Team Structure that Simplifies Reporting, Narrows Accountability, Improves Decision Making. January 22nd, 2009. Retrieved from http//www. internetretailer. com/internet/marketing- conference/35591-radioshack-corporation-announces-new-management-team-structure-that-simplifies-reporting. html Kaizenlog. (n. d. ). Advantages of the Functional Structure. January 22nd, 2009. Retrieved from http//www. kaizenlog. com/2006/11/02/advantages-of-the-functional-structure/